US Open 2026 pages

Sports · US Open 2026 · Men's Singles · Round of 128

Zizou Bergs vs Carlos Taberner — 6-3 3-6 6-2 6-2

Zizou Bergs✓6366
Carlos Taberner3622

Final · Wednesday, September 2, 2026 · Round of 128

Result

Zizou Bergs began a Grand Slam as a seed for the first time and needed two days to get out of the first round. He and Taberner opened on Court 12 on Tuesday evening; Bergs took the first set 6-3, lost the second 3-6, won the third 6-2 and had just moved 2-1 ahead in the fourth when rain ended play for the night. He finished the job on Wednesday, closing out 6-2 — 2hr 51min of actual tennis spread across two days. Spanish coverage of the suspended portion called it an even match of high quality; the serving was not, Bergs hitting 11 aces to none and converting six of seven break points against two of seven. Taberner, in the draw on a protected ranking after a season lost to physical problems, is still without a Grand Slam main-draw win. Bergs, who reached the third round here last year, meets Jesper de Jong next.

31Bergs✓
Taberner
6–33–66–26–2
Zizou Bergs
Carlos Taberner
11Aces0
8Double faults6
51%1st serve in57%
82%1st-serve points won60%
55%2nd-serve points won52%
138 mphFastest serve130 mph
6/7Break points won2/7
43Winners6
25Unforced errors9
10/16Net points won1/1
111Total points won86
1546.6 mDistance run1443.9 m

Rows the source hadn’t published are left off rather than guessed.

At this Stage

Round of 128: the round of ranking gaps, and this is one of the widest on the schedule — a 31st seed against the world No. 400. The bracket arithmetic is friendly to whoever survives: a Round of 64 against de Jong or a qualifier, with the section's heavyweights parked rounds away. For Bergs, a .500 season makes every early round a referendum; for Taberner, one win here would double his 2026 total and then some. Play runs Sunday through Tuesday.

Round of 128

Zizou Bergs✓
Carlos Taberner
Aug 30–Sep 1
6-3 3-6 6-2 6-2
Jesper de Jong✓
Francesco Passaro
Aug 30–Sep 1
2-6 6-2 4-6 6-3 6-2

Round of 64

Zizou Bergs✓
Jesper de Jong
Sep 2–3
7-5 1-6 6-2 7-6(2)

What we know now

Court: Court 10

Match length: 2:51

Watch: ESPN · ESPN2 · ABC · ESPN app

What I said beforehand

The preview, frozen before the first serve. Clearly dated, never rewritten — that's the deal that makes the pick worth anything.

Bergs, in the kind of first-rounder a seed is supposed to bank. Taberner arrives ranked No. 400 with zero tour-level wins in 2026 and a career that has run mostly on clay; Bergs, seeded 31st, is a US Open third-rounder from last year with a serve-forward game built for this court. The Belgian's own season is nothing to frame (17–18), which is the only reason to watch the first set with any suspicion — a seed at .500 can be talked into a bad afternoon. But the gap in current level is close to 400 ranking places wide, and best-of-five is where that width shows. Straight sets is the reasonable expectation.

The case for Zizou Bergs

84% to win

Everything on the page favors him: the seeding, the surface, the third round he reached here twelve months ago, and an opponent who has not won a tour-level match all season. Bergs's first-strike tennis keeps matches on his racquet — against a claycourt grinder short on match play, that is the whole script.

The case for Carlos Taberner

16% to win

Taberner's route to trouble runs through patience: make the .500 seed play long, neutral rallies and let the scoreboard do its work on nerves. He has nothing to lose, a veteran's court sense at 29, and the freedom of a man playing with house money — the classic profile of the first-round score nobody saw coming.

Both cases written 2026-08-28, before the first ball — frozen into the record exactly as written, whatever the result. The percentages are mine — opinions with a percent sign on. They add to 100 because tennis has no draw to hide the rounding in.

My locked pick: Zizou Bergs to advance ✓ RIGHT

“A seeded hard-courter against a clay veteran with no tour wins all season — the widest level gap in this section.”

Locked 2026-08-28 02:55 UTC — rendered verbatim from the pick ledger; never a fresher, hedged version

Tale of the tape

Zizou BergsCarlos Taberner
0Career head-to-head0
27Age29
6′1″ (1.85 m)Height6′0″ (1.83 m)
88 kg (193 lb)Weight78 kg (172 lb)
Right-handedPlaysRight-handed
2018Turned pro2015
No. 37RankingNo. 400
18–192026 win–loss0–2
69–71Career on hard courts14–21
0Grand Slam titles0
3R (2025)Best at the US Open1R (2021)

Player vitals: US Open official player feed (usopen.org) and Tennis Abstract career match logs · as of 2026-08-28.

Career head-to-head: Tennis Abstract career match logs (tour-level) · as of 2026-08-27.

Storylines

  • Bergs's third round here in 2025 is his best Grand Slam result — as the 31st seed he is protected from another seed until that same round.
  • Taberner, ranked No. 400, is 0–2 at tour level in 2026; this is his first US Open main-draw appearance since 2021.
  • First career meeting — Bergs has never played a Spaniard ranked this low at a major, and Taberner has never faced a seed in New York.

Head to head

Never met. Bergs's tour breakthrough came after Taberner's ranking slide had already begun, so the careers simply never crossed — Sunday is the first look either gets.

Source: Tennis Abstract career match logs (tour-level) · as of 2026-08-27.

Court & schedule: Court 10, Wednesday 2 September. The US Open posts each day's order of play the evening before; this one is on the board. (Official US Open order of play, as of 2026-09-02)

Weather: Sunday — the men's final, and the last match of the fortnight — was forecast at 78°F with showers and thunderstorms 95% likely, the wettest day of the two weeks and the one day that could not be pushed back. The rain came in the morning and stopped before the final, which Ashe played with its roof open. It cleared from there: 15% overnight, 15% Monday, then dry and sunny. (National Weather Service New York forecast, as of 2026-09-13)

Venue: USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center, Flushing Meadows, New York — hard.

Suggestions?

Spot a mistake — a wrong score, a result that’s gone stale, a bracket that doesn’t look right? Or do you just have a better idea for this page? Either way, I’d rather hear it than not. Send me a line — a sentence is plenty, and I’ll take it from there.