US Open 2026 pages

Sports · US Open 2026 · Mixed Doubles · Semi-finals

Muchova / Mensik vs Andreeva / Rublev — 5-4(6) 3-5 11-9

Muchova/Mensik✓5311
Andreeva/Rublev4659

Final · Wednesday, August 26, 2026 · Semi-finals

Result

Muchova/Mensik✓
Andreeva/Rublev
5–4(6)3–511–9
Muchova / Mensik
Andreeva / Rublev
6Aces4
3Double faults4
69%1st serve in66%
76%1st-serve points won79%
37%2nd-serve points won45%
136 mphFastest serve135 mph
1/2Break points won2/4
17Winners22
15Unforced errors15
58Total points won62

Rows the source hadn’t published are left off rather than guessed.

At this Stage

Where both players stand in the draw — the match each came through, and what winning this one is worth.

Quarter-finals

Siniakova/Patten
Svitolina/Monfils✓
Aug 25
5-4(6) 4-5(3) 10-8
Bencic/Cobolli✓
Williams/Alcaraz
Aug 25
5-4(4) 4-1
Muchova/Mensik✓
Navarro/Paul
Aug 25
4-1 5-3
Andreeva/Rublev✓
Shnaider/Ruud
Aug 25
4-1 4-5(9) 10-5

Semi-finals

Bencic/Cobolli✓
Svitolina/Monfils
Aug 26
4-5(7) 4-1 10-5
Muchova/Mensik✓
Andreeva/Rublev
Aug 26
5-4(6) 3-5 11-9

Final

Bencic/Cobolli
Muchova/Mensik✓
Aug 26
6-3 1-6 10-6

What we know now

Court: Arthur Ashe Stadium

Match length: 1:23

Watch: ESPN2 · ESPN+

What I said beforehand

The preview, frozen before the first serve. Clearly dated, never rewritten — that's the deal that makes the pick worth anything.

Muchova and Mensik, narrowly, and I hold it loosely. The Czech pair have been the most efficient team in the draw — 4-1 5-3 past Emma Navarro and Tommy Paul in 48 minutes, the shortest quarter-final of the round — and Mensik's serve is the single biggest weapon in this match. Sets to four with no-advantage scoring compress everything into a handful of decisive points, and a first-strike server who holds cheaply forces the other pair to be perfect on their own delivery. Muchova is also the most naturally gifted volleyer left in the event; the drop-volley touch that makes her singles game so distinctive is worth more in doubles than it is anywhere else. Andreeva and Rublev have beaten the better field by a distance — the reigning champions Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori in round one, saving a match point, then Casper Ruud and Diana Shnaider in the quarters, closing it on their fifth match point of the tiebreak. That is three of last year's four finalists, and a team that keeps winning the tight ones is a team you underestimate at your own cost. But both of those wins needed a deciding tiebreak, and both were rescued rather than controlled. I will take the pair that has spent the least time in danger, and expect to be nervous about it.

The case for Muchova / Mensik

54.5% to win

The most economical team left: 48 minutes to beat Navarro and Paul 4-1 5-3, and no drama at all in the quarter-final. Mensik's serve is the biggest single shot in the match and short no-advantage sets are built to reward it — hold cheaply twice and you have a set. Muchova's hands at the net are the best in the last four, and an all-Czech pair who have both spent their careers on this surface do not need long to work out where the other one is standing.

The case for Andreeva / Rublev

45.5% to win

They have taken out three of the four players who contested last year's final: the reigning champions Errani and Vavassori in round one, saving a match point in an 11-9 tiebreak, and Ruud in the quarters. Nothing about their route has been comfortable and they have won it anyway — the quarter-final took five match points. Rublev's forehand is the heaviest ball on court and Andreeva, at 19, is the most improved player in the draw. A team that keeps surviving deciding tiebreaks tends to be good at deciding tiebreaks.

Both cases written 2026-08-26, before the first ball — frozen into the record exactly as written, whatever the result. The percentages are mine — opinions with a percent sign on. They add to 100 because tennis has no draw to hide the rounding in.

My locked pick: Muchova / Mensik to advance ✓ RIGHT

“Mensik's serve is the biggest weapon in a format that rewards it most, and their quarter-final took 48 minutes to Andreeva and Rublev's two rescued deciders.”

Locked 2026-08-26 17:20 UTC — rendered verbatim from the pick ledger; never a fresher, hedged version

Storylines

  • Andreeva and Rublev have beaten three of the four players from last year's final — reigning champions Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori in round one, and Casper Ruud in the quarter-finals.
  • Both of Andreeva and Rublev's wins went to a 10-point match tiebreak; they saved a match point against the champions and needed five of their own to close the quarter-final.
  • Muchova and Mensik beat Emma Navarro and Tommy Paul 4-1 5-3 in 48 minutes, the quickest quarter-final of the round.
  • Neither pair is seeded — the No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 seeds all went out in the first round, and the only surviving seed is in the other semi-final.

Head to head

These two pairs have never met. Both partnerships were assembled for this event, and the revamped championship is only in its second edition — neither pair appears in the 2025 draw, so there is no head-to-head to read.

Source: US Open mixed doubles draws, 2025 and 2026 · as of 2026-08-26.

Court & schedule: Arthur Ashe Stadium, Wednesday 26 August in the night session. The US Open posts each day's order of play the evening before; this one is on the board. (Official US Open order of play, as of 2026-09-07)

Weather: Sunday — the men's final, and the last match of the fortnight — is 78°F with showers and thunderstorms 95% likely, the wettest day of the two weeks and the one day that cannot be pushed back. Ashe closes its roof and plays on. It clears overnight: 20% Sunday night, 20% Monday, then dry and sunny from Tuesday. (National Weather Service New York forecast, as of 2026-09-13)

Venue: USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center, Flushing Meadows, New York — hard.

Suggestions?

Spot a mistake — a wrong score, a result that’s gone stale, a bracket that doesn’t look right? Or do you just have a better idea for this page? Either way, I’d rather hear it than not. Send me a line — a sentence is plenty, and I’ll take it from there.