US Open: Famous Points

Sports · Tennis · US Open

Famous Points

Highlight reels show you the shot. This page shows you the geometry: the most famous points (and one famous tiebreak) in US Open history, reconstructed on the court — real names, real scoreboards, and a click that plays each moment one swing at a time. The Scoring page teaches how tennis works; this is why anyone cares.

Every card below is a stylized reconstruction, drawn from the footage and the written record rather than tracking data: the sequence of shots, their directions, their landing areas, and every score are the real history; the exact flight paths are my illustration. Scores, dates, and quotes are reference-grade — verified 2026-08-26 — and each card links its record. Where footage rights-holders post the real thing, I link out; nothing is embedded or re-hosted.

2011 · Semifinal · Arthur Ashe Stadium

The return heard ’round the world

Novak Djokovic d. Roger Federer, 6–7(7), 4–6, 6–3, 6–2, 7–5 · September 10, 2011

Djokovic’s 2011 was already the season of the century — but Federer had him down two match points on the biggest court in the sport, with 23,000 people begging for the finish. What happened next is the most famous single point in modern US Open history: a full-swing forehand return, hit as if the scoreboard didn’t exist.

FEDERERDJOKOVIC
Djokovic646615
Federer763240
Two match points, Federer
Federer serving 5–3, 40–15 in the fifth — double match point for a place in the final.

Click play and the reconstruction runs once, then waits: the recap of what you just watched appears right here.

Reconstruction, not tracking data: right sequence, right directions, right landing areas, right score — the exact paths are drawn by hand from the footage. That goes for every card on this page; the methodology note has the details.

Watch it: the 2011 semifinal comebackThe US Open’s official channel on YouTube
Match points saved: 2Federer games won after: 0Same trick, 2010 SF: also 2 MPsDjokovic’s 2011: 10–1 vs Federer & Nadal
Federer’s second match point vanished two points later — his net-rushing forehand clipped the tape and fell out — and he never won another game: Djokovic closed 7–5 and beat Nadal for the title. The footnote that makes it stranger: Djokovic had saved two match points against Federer in the 2010 semifinal too, on the same court. Some rivalries just pick an author.
— the booth, what happened next

The record: BBC Sport's match report and Tennis.com’s retrospectives.

2009 · Semifinal · Arthur Ashe Stadium

The tweener

Roger Federer d. Novak Djokovic, 7–6(3), 7–5, 7–5 · September 13, 2009

Two and a half hours in, Djokovic tried the honest way to win a point: drop shot to drag Federer in, lob to send him back. It worked perfectly. Federer was left sprinting toward his own baseline with the ball dying behind him and his back to the entire sport — which is exactly where he chose to hit the shot of his life.

DJOKOVICFEDERER
Djokovic650
Federer7730
Djokovic serving to stay in it
Federer up two sets and 6–5 in the third; Djokovic serving to stay in it, love–30.

Click play and the reconstruction runs once, then waits: the recap of what you just watched appears right here.

Watch it: the tweenerThe US Open’s official channel on YouTube
Federer’s verdict: greatest shot of his lifeSixth straight US Open finalStrikes in the point: 8The lob that invited it: Djokovic’s
The tweener made it love–40; Federer converted the first match point and walked into his sixth consecutive US Open final. “It’s the greatest shot I ever hit in my life,” he said on court, still grinning. Djokovic’s review was shorter: a stunned smirk.
— the booth, what happened next

The record: Sky Sports’ clip of the shot and the ATP’s rivalry retrospective.

1991 · Fourth round · Louis Armstrong Stadium

Connors at 39: the birthday tiebreak

Jimmy Connors d. Aaron Krickstein, 3–6, 7–6(8), 1–6, 6–3, 7–6(4) · September 2, 1991

Tennis.com calls it the No. 1 US Open match ever played, and it’s not really about tennis: a 39-year-old man on a surgically repaired wrist, fifteen years older than his opponent, dragging Labor Day — and his own birthday party — into a fifth-set tiebreak. The record preserves five of its eleven points; I’ve reconstructed exactly those five, and the strip below is honest about the gaps.

CONNORSKRICKSTEIN
Fifth-set tiebreak0–0
1234567891011
6–6 in the fifth — Krickstein led the set 5–2
His 39th birthday, ranked No. 174, down 2–5 in the fifth — then a deciding tiebreak, four hours and change in.

One click per beat: the five points the record preserves, in order, with the strip tracking the score between them.

Watch it: Connors–Krickstein, the match to rememberThe US Open’s official channel on YouTube
Age 39 vs 24Ranked No. 174From 2–5 down in the fifth4 hours 41 minutesPlayed on his birthday
Four hours, forty-one minutes. Connors beat Haarhuis in the quarters too — including a rally where he returned three overheads — before Courier finally ended the run in the semis. Nobody remembers the semis. Everybody remembers the birthday.
— the booth, what happened next

The record: Tennis.com’s No. 1 US Open match of all time and a point-by-point retrospective.

2004 · Quarterfinal · Arthur Ashe Stadium

The overrule that gave tennis replay

Jennifer Capriati d. Serena Williams, 2–6, 6–4, 6–4 · September 7, 2004

This is the one moment on this page where the court diagram is the whole argument. Serena’s backhand down the line landed in — an inch or more inside the sideline, called in by the line judge, plain on the TV replay system the tours weren’t using yet. Chair umpire Mariana Alves overruled it out anyway. Watch where the ball lands, and where the ring sits: that’s the point tennis’s replay era was born.

S. WILLIAMSCAPRIATI
S. Williams6440
Capriati2640
Deuce — first game of the deciding set
First game of the deciding set, Serena serving at deuce — and the match about to stop making sense.

Click play and the reconstruction runs once, then waits: the recap of what you just watched appears right here.

Watch it: the full 2004 quarter-finalThe USTA’s own full-match page
Bad calls that set: 4Apology from the Open: next dayReplay debut: 2006 US OpenThe ball: in by an inch-plus
It was the first of four bad calls in the set, all against Serena, who lost 6–4. The US Open apologized the next day; Alves didn’t work another match that tournament; and by the 2006 US Open, players could challenge calls to Hawk-Eye — the first Grand Slam with replay. Serena lost the point and changed the sport.
— the booth, what happened next

The record: Tennis.com’s history of the call and the USTA’s full-match video page.

2012 · Final · Arthur Ashe Stadium

The 54-shot rally

Andy Murray d. Novak Djokovic, 7–6(10), 7–5, 2–6, 3–6, 6–2 · September 10, 2012

Sometimes the famous thing isn’t a shot, it’s a sentence: they hit the ball fifty-four times. This reconstruction runs long on purpose — settle in, click play, and feel how a rally stops being about winners and becomes about who blinks. Djokovic won the point. It’s not clear he won the trade.

MURRAYDJOKOVIC
Murray3
Djokovic2
First set · sixth game
First set of the final, sixth game, Murray serving, in a swirling wind — one point that became a siege.

Click play and the reconstruction runs once, then waits: the recap of what you just watched appears right here.

Watch it: the 54-shot rallyThe US Open’s official channel on YouTube
Strikes of the ball: 54First-set tiebreak: 12–10, 24 minMatch: 4 h 54 minFirst British male champion since 1936
Murray took the set anyway, 12–10 in a 24-minute tiebreak — the longest in a US Open men’s final — on his sixth set point, and five sets later became the first British man to win a major since Fred Perry in 1936. The rally is the whole match in miniature: nobody gave anyone anything.
— the booth, what happened next

The record: ESPN’s final report and the Wikipedia final page’s set-by-set record.

2022 · Quarterfinal · Arthur Ashe Stadium

Match point, 2:50 a.m.

Carlos Alcaraz d. Jannik Sinner, 6–3, 6–7(7), 6–7(0), 7–5, 6–3 · September 7–8, 2022

Before they were the sport’s defining rivalry, they were two kids keeping a stadium awake past two in the morning. Sinner, 21, had the match on his racquet. Alcaraz, 19, answered with the return that started everything — deep, brave, and heavy enough to break the shot Sinner trusted most.

SINNERALCARAZ
Sinner3775
Alcaraz6664
Match point, Sinner
Sinner serving for the match at 5–4 in the fourth, match point up, deep in the New York night.

Click play and the reconstruction runs once, then waits: the recap of what you just watched appears right here.

Watch it: highlights of the 2022 quarter-finalThe US Open’s official channel on YouTube
Finished 2:50 a.m. — latest ever5 h 15 minMatch points saved: 1Twelve days later: champion & No. 1
“I still don’t know how I did it,” Alcaraz said when it ended — at 2:50 a.m., the latest finish in US Open history, five hours and fifteen minutes after it began. He broke two games later, took the fifth, then the semifinal, then the title — and became the youngest world No. 1 ever ranked. The rivalry has owned September ever since.
— the booth, what happened next

The record: the US Open’s own recap and the ATP’s match-of-the-year flashback.

Methodology. Each animation is a stylized reconstruction I scripted by hand from public footage and contemporaneous match reports (BBC, ESPN, Tennis.com, usopen.org, and the outlets linked on each card) — not ball-tracking data. What the reconstruction holds exactly: the shot sequence, shot directions, landing areas, endings, and every score shown on the boards. What is illustrative: the precise flight paths and speeds. The Connors card animates only the five tiebreak points the record preserves and says where the gaps are. Facts verified 2026-08-26. The court, physics, and player are the same engine as the Scoring walkthrough — every serve lands in a legal box and every shot clears the net by construction. Footage is linked on rights-holders’ own sites only, never embedded; player names appear nominatively in factual, historical reporting. A new legendary moment earns a card at most once a year — the roster grows after each final, if the final earns it.

Suggestions?

Spot a mistake — a wrong score, a result that’s gone stale, a bracket that doesn’t look right? Or do you just have a better idea for this page? Either way, I’d rather hear it than not. Send me a line — a sentence is plenty, and I’ll take it from there.