US Open 2026 pages

Sports · US Open 2026 · Women's Singles · Round of 128

Aryna Sabalenka vs Camila Osorio — 6-2 6-4

Aryna Sabalenka✓66
Camila Osorio24

Final · Monday, August 31, 2026 · Round of 128

Result

Sabalenka dropped the opening game of the tournament's Ashe day session and then won four in a row, which was roughly the shape of the whole thing. Osorio took one more game before the top seed served out the set 6-2 with five aces in it; in the second the Colombian led 3-2 and won exactly one more game. The margins were blunter than the score — 32 winners to 18, nine Osorio double faults to four, five breaks from eight chances — and it took 1 hour 27 minutes. Sabalenka came in off a strange major season: an Australian Open final she lost, then early exits at Roland Garros and Wimbledon, and the No. 1 ranking intact anyway.

1Sabalenka✓
Osorio
6–26–4
Aryna Sabalenka
Camila Osorio
5Aces3
4Double faults9
58%1st serve in56%
63%1st-serve points won66%
52%2nd-serve points won25%
117 mphFastest serve111 mph
5/8Break points won2/7
32Winners18
23Unforced errors19
13/16Net points won7/8
73Total points won60
963.7 mDistance run1079.1 m

Rows the source hadn’t published are left off rather than guessed.

At this Stage

Round of 128, and the women's draw opens at its summit: the two-time defending champion, world No. 1, chasing the three-peat only Evert and Serena have managed here in the Open Era. Sabalenka's season — 40 wins, an Australian Open final, the top ranking never surrendered — makes her the tournament's reference point; everyone else's path is measured by where it crosses hers. Osorio gets the first measurement. The winner meets Zarazúa or a qualifier in the Round of 64. Women's first-round play runs Sunday through Tuesday.

Round of 128

Aryna Sabalenka✓
Camila Osorio
Aug 30–Sep 1
6-2 6-4
Renata Zarazua
Polina Iatcenko✓
Aug 30–Sep 1
4-6 6-4 7-6(7)

Round of 64

Aryna Sabalenka✓
Polina Iatcenko
Sep 2–3
6-1 6-1

What we know now

Court: Arthur Ashe Stadium

Match length: 1:27

Watch: ESPN · ESPN2 · ABC · ESPN app

What I said beforehand

The preview, frozen before the first serve. Clearly dated, never rewritten — that's the deal that makes the pick worth anything.

Sabalenka. The world No. 1 opens her bid for a third straight US Open title — chasing an Open Era feat only Chris Evert and Serena Williams have managed here — against an opponent she has beaten twice without drama. Osorio is a genuine competitor whose 17–17 season and counterpunching craft keep scoreboards respectable, but the physics are unkind: Sabalenka's 40–8 year has been built on first-strike violence that Osorio's game absorbs rather than answers, and the two prior meetings (6-0 6-3, 6-4 7-5) map the range of likely outcomes fairly. The number one's early rounds here have occasionally wobbled under her own error count; that is the only route to interest. Straight sets, the second tighter than the first.

The case for Aryna Sabalenka

90% to win

Two-time defending champion, world No. 1, a 40–8 season, and 297 career hard-court wins: Sabalenka arrives as the most accomplished hard-court player in the women's field, and both prior meetings with Osorio ended in straight sets. Her serve-forehand combination is the heaviest opening statement in the draw.

The case for Camila Osorio

10% to win

Osorio thrives as the underdog with nothing to lose — her speed and depth force the big hitters to supply their own rhythm, and Sabalenka's opening-round error counts have historically been her most vulnerable stat. Both previous meetings had competitive stretches; extending them a set further is the whole assignment.

Both cases written 2026-08-28, before the first ball — frozen into the record exactly as written, whatever the result. The percentages are mine — opinions with a percent sign on. They add to 100 because tennis has no draw to hide the rounding in.

My locked pick: Aryna Sabalenka to advance ✓ RIGHT

“Two straight titles here, a 40–8 season, and a 2–0 head-to-head — the heaviest game in the draw against a counterpuncher who absorbs rather than answers.”

Locked 2026-08-28 04:35 UTC — rendered verbatim from the pick ledger; never a fresher, hedged version

Tale of the tape

Aryna SabalenkaCamila Osorio
2Career head-to-head0
28Age24
6′0″ (1.83 m)Height5′7″ (1.70 m)
Right-handedPlaysRight-handed
No. 1RankingNo. 58
43–92026 win–loss17–17
300–107Career on hard courts70–68
4Grand Slam titles0
Champion (×2)Best at the US Open2R (2022)

Player vitals: US Open official player feed (usopen.org) and Tennis Abstract career match logs · as of 2026-08-28.

Career head-to-head: Tennis Abstract career match logs (tour-level) · as of 2026-08-27.

Storylines

  • Sabalenka is chasing a third consecutive US Open title — an Open Era feat only Chris Evert and Serena Williams have managed here.
  • She arrives at 40–8 having lost January's Australian Open final to Rybakina — New York is where her season's biggest defense lives.
  • Sabalenka has won both prior meetings with Osorio in straight sets, on grass and clay; this is their first hard-court match.

Head to head

Sabalenka leads 2–0 — 6-0 6-3 at Wimbledon 2021 and 6-4 7-5 in Madrid 2023. Osorio's competitive second sets are the honest footnote; a won set is not among them.

Source: Tennis Abstract career match logs (tour-level) · as of 2026-08-27.

Court & schedule: Arthur Ashe Stadium, Monday 31 August. The US Open posts each day's order of play the evening before; this one is on the board. (Official US Open order of play, as of 2026-08-28)

Weather: Sunday — the men's final, and the last match of the fortnight — was forecast at 78°F with showers and thunderstorms 95% likely, the wettest day of the two weeks and the one day that could not be pushed back. The rain came in the morning and stopped before the final, which Ashe played with its roof open. It cleared from there: 15% overnight, 15% Monday, then dry and sunny. (National Weather Service New York forecast, as of 2026-09-13)

Venue: USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center, Flushing Meadows, New York — hard.

Suggestions?

Spot a mistake — a wrong score, a result that’s gone stale, a bracket that doesn’t look right? Or do you just have a better idea for this page? Either way, I’d rather hear it than not. Send me a line — a sentence is plenty, and I’ll take it from there.