Wimbledon 2026 pages

Sports · Wimbledon 2026 · Men's Singles · Round of 32

Novak Djokovic vs Arthur Rinderknech — 7-5 6-4 1-6 7-6(4)

Novak Djokovic7617
Arthur Rinderknech54664

Final · Friday, July 3, 2026 · Round of 32

Result

Djokovic survived Rinderknech 7-5 6-4 1-6 7-6(4), ending the Frenchman’s serve barrage in a fourth-set tiebreak. Rinderknech hit 21 aces and 67 winners, but Djokovic took the tighter scoreboard moments and closed the match with only 16 unforced errors.

7Djokovic
25Rinderknech
7–56–41–67–6(4)
Novak Djokovic
Arthur Rinderknech
15Aces21
3Double faults4
68%1st serve in61%
73%1st-serve points won82%
67%2nd-serve points won64%
127 mphFastest serve138 mph
3/9Break points won3/5
40Winners67
16Unforced errors25
29/39Net points won31/39
108Total points won117
2119 mDistance run2458 m

Stats: Official wimbledon.com match statistics (IBM) · as of 2026-07-09

Rows the source hadn’t published are left off rather than guessed.

At this Stage

Djokovic is into another Wimbledon last 16, but Rinderknech made him work for the privilege. The No. 25 seed landed 21 aces, won the third set 6-1, and even finished ahead in raw points on TennisTemple’s count; Djokovic still took the first two sets by narrow margins and the fourth in a tiebreak, which is a very Djokovic way to make the arithmetic feel irrelevant. He now plays Roman Safiullin, who has already removed Rublev and Fonseca. Rinderknech exits with proof that the serve was real; Djokovic exits with the draw still alive beneath him.

Round of 64

Roman Safiullin
Botic van de Zandschulp
Jul 1–2
6-0 4-6 6-3 3-6 7-6(5)
João Fonseca
Jesper de Jong
Jul 1–2
6-1 7-5 6-4
Arthur Rinderknech
Martin Damm
Jul 1–2
6-4 7-6(1) 6-3
Novak Djokovic
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Jul 1–2
6-3 6-4 6-2

Round of 32

João Fonseca
Roman Safiullin
Jul 3–4
6-3 6-3 6-3
Novak Djokovic
Arthur Rinderknech
Jul 3–4
7-5 6-4 1-6 7-6(4)

Round of 16

Novak Djokovic
Roman Safiullin
Jul 5–6
7-6(6) 6-3 3-6 6-3

What we know now

Court: Centre Court

Match length: 3:01

Watch: ESPN · ESPN+

What I said beforehand

The preview, frozen before the first serve. Clearly dated, never rewritten — that's the deal that makes the pick worth anything.

Djokovic. I keep looking for the angle that makes this close and keep landing on the same wall: a seven-time Wimbledon champion, 125–21 on grass for his career, against a legitimate top-30 player whose game just doesn't travel to this surface. Rinderknech can beat anyone on a fast hard court — he reached the 2025 Shanghai Masters final through Zverev, Auger-Aliassime and Medvedev — but grass is his weakest surface, a losing career record, and he has arrived at 8–14 on the season. The serve is enormous, and if this becomes a tiebreak shootout the margins tighten; he has already won three breakers across two rounds here. But best-of-five is where Djokovic's return and his refusal to hand over a cheap game grind a serve-first grass plan into the lawn. I think the Frenchman holds honourably, nicks a set if the serve stays hot, and not much more.

The case for Novak Djokovic

83.5% to win

A seven-time Wimbledon champion with a 125–21 career record on grass does not need a kind draw, and he has had one: two rounds, a single set conceded — to Wu Yibing in the opener — then a straight-sets dismissal of Stefanos Tsitsipas. On grass his return sits so far inside the baseline that a serve-first opponent loses the free hold the whole plan depends on, and best-of-five gives him room to drop a tiebreak and still be the favourite in every set that follows. The case for Djokovic is the one it has been for a decade here: he makes you play one more ball than you want to.

The case for Arthur Rinderknech

16.5% to win

The 25th seed is a bigger threat than the ranking gap suggests: a 2025 Shanghai Masters finalist who beat Zverev, Auger-Aliassime and Medvedev on that run, and a US Open fourth-round debutant the same year. His serve is the best weapon left in this quarter, and on a quick Centre Court it shortens rallies and steals the free points a returner hates to give up. The catch is the surface and the form — grass is comfortably his weakest (a losing career record on it), and he has come into the fortnight at 8–14 on the season. The upset needs the serve firing, a clutch tiebreak or two, and a Djokovic half a step slow.

Both cases written 2026-07-01, before the first ball — frozen into the record exactly as written, whatever the result. The percentages are mine, quoted to a decimal because false precision is funnier — and tennis has no draw to hide the rounding in.

My locked pick: Novak Djokovic to advance ✓ RIGHT

“Best-of-five on grass against a seven-time champion is the wrong place to be a one-weapon player, however big the weapon.”

Locked 2026-07-01 14:05 UTC — rendered verbatim from the pick ledger; never a fresher, hedged version

Tale of the tape

Novak DjokovicArthur Rinderknech
39Age30
6′2″ (1.88 m)Height6′5″ (1.96 m)
77 kg (170 lb)Weight88 kg (194 lb)
Right-handed, two-handed backhandPlaysRight-handed, two-handed backhand
2003Turned pro2018
No. 8ATP rankingNo. 26
10–42026 win–loss8–14
125–21Career on grass22–23
24Grand Slam titles0
Champion (×7)Best at WimbledonThird round (2025, 2026)
Viktor TroickiCoach

Player vitals: ATP Tour player profiles and Wikipedia (career records) · as of 2026-07-09.

Storylines

  • Djokovic is two wins from the second week at the All England Club, the grass major where his record — seven titles, 125–21 for his career — dwarfs the rest of the draw.
  • Rinderknech is no lucky-draw underdog: the 25th seed was a 2025 Shanghai Masters finalist and reached the US Open fourth round the same year, and he is back in the Wimbledon third round for a second straight year.
  • The catch for the Frenchman is the surface — grass is his weakest, a losing career record, and he has arrived at 8–14 on the season, on the one court that most rewards Djokovic's return.

Court & schedule: Centre Court (TennisTemple match stats and ESPN scoreboard, as of 2026-07-03)

Venue: All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, London — grass.

Suggestions?

Spot a mistake — a wrong score, a result that’s gone stale, a bracket that doesn’t look right? Or do you just have a better idea for this page? Either way, I’d rather hear it than not. Send me a line — a sentence is plenty, and I’ll take it from there.